Comments on: A Rational Argument Against FCC Regulated Net Neutrality http://www.hasemanonmobile.com/2009/10/24/a-rational-argument-against-the-fcc-regulating-net-neutrality/ Mobile Development, Software, and anything else Wed, 04 Aug 2010 18:09:37 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1 By: Bruce http://www.hasemanonmobile.com/2009/10/24/a-rational-argument-against-the-fcc-regulating-net-neutrality/comment-page-1/#comment-372 Bruce Wed, 19 May 2010 15:13:58 +0000 http://www.hasemanonmobile.com/?p=73#comment-372 I think you got it. There are such laws that might make sense, but as soon as the door is open to regulation there is no closing it....and there's no telling what kind of lobbyist infused monster is going to shamble through. I think you got it. There are such laws that might make sense, but as soon as the door is open to regulation there is no closing it….and there’s no telling what kind of lobbyist infused monster is going to shamble through.

]]> By: Tolerance Juice / Network Neutrality Simplified http://www.hasemanonmobile.com/2009/10/24/a-rational-argument-against-the-fcc-regulating-net-neutrality/comment-page-1/#comment-103 Tolerance Juice / Network Neutrality Simplified Tue, 27 Oct 2009 06:07:30 +0000 http://www.hasemanonmobile.com/?p=73#comment-103 [...] ran across an article simplifying a sometimes complicated issue: Even if we give the FCC a very tight mandate for [...] [...] ran across an article simplifying a sometimes complicated issue: Even if we give the FCC a very tight mandate for [...]

]]> By: uberVU - social comments http://www.hasemanonmobile.com/2009/10/24/a-rational-argument-against-the-fcc-regulating-net-neutrality/comment-page-1/#comment-102 uberVU - social comments Mon, 26 Oct 2009 09:16:29 +0000 http://www.hasemanonmobile.com/?p=73#comment-102 <strong>Social comments and analytics for this post...</strong> This post was mentioned on Twitter by haseman: A reasoned argument against FCC regulation of 'Net Neutrality' http://bit.ly/roXOM... Social comments and analytics for this post…

This post was mentioned on Twitter by haseman: A reasoned argument against FCC regulation of ‘Net Neutrality’ http://bit.ly/roXOM...

]]> By: Haseman http://www.hasemanonmobile.com/2009/10/24/a-rational-argument-against-the-fcc-regulating-net-neutrality/comment-page-1/#comment-101 Haseman Sun, 25 Oct 2009 15:38:41 +0000 http://www.hasemanonmobile.com/?p=73#comment-101 I think you got it. There are such laws that might make sense, but as soon as the door is open to regulation there is no closing it....and there's no telling what kind of lobbyist infused monster is going to shamble through. I think you got it. There are such laws that might make sense, but as soon as the door is open to regulation there is no closing it….and there’s no telling what kind of lobbyist infused monster is going to shamble through.

]]> By: barry http://www.hasemanonmobile.com/2009/10/24/a-rational-argument-against-the-fcc-regulating-net-neutrality/comment-page-1/#comment-100 barry Sun, 25 Oct 2009 15:29:47 +0000 http://www.hasemanonmobile.com/?p=73#comment-100 Is there not another (third) alternative? Say a law which simply makes illegal the discrimination of packets by network providers but which does not set up a regulatory agency. It would then be up to private individuals or other businesses to find the evidence that a network was being operated unfairly, but at least they would have legal recourse if they had a valid and provable claim. Then again perhaps Washington is incapable of passing such a law. Is there not another (third) alternative? Say a law which simply makes illegal the discrimination of packets by network providers but which does not set up a regulatory agency. It would then be up to private individuals or other businesses to find the evidence that a network was being operated unfairly, but at least they would have legal recourse if they had a valid and provable claim. Then again perhaps Washington is incapable of passing such a law.

]]>